Coming out of Autumn's litcrit seminar I have pretty mixed feelings. First, the class was on Thursday evenings from 6:10-8 which definitely didn't help at all. Second, the seminar itself does not need to be two hours long. It dragged on and on and on every week, though I find this to be partially a flaw of the course itself.
It is clear that Autumn is intelligent and can analyze literature. But to me, I only felt that she knew how to teach her specific field of focus, African American literature, which was demonstrated when we read the final text, Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man. For the other texts (poetry/Hamlet/Pride and Prejudice) I felt that she did not facilitate the discussion well at all--there was often a lull in the conversation and she would sometimes ask questions that didn't make entire sense or just that no one knew how to answer. On the other hand, we had one of the other seminar leaders as a sub for one week and she asked very easy questions simply to get people to talk, and I'm not sure which was worse.
Also, it was evident that Autumn was wrapped up in her dissertation which she's currently in the middle of/in the process of finishing soon. So I didn't find she was really prepared for the seminars. And I didn't feel that I got a whole lot out of the seminars, although usually the first hour was alright and some of the students in my class made some good points. She was pretty disorganized and routinely misplaced/lost papers we handed in or missed emails we sent her, and she would always say she was handing back a paper on X day and then actually hand it back two weeks after said day.
Despite my misgivings about her class, I will say that she's very good one on one. I felt that I learned a lot going to office hours. She made really good comments when we spoke about my essays and my ideas for essays. She does some good analysis and can really help you understand your own thoughts better.
Along that note, she was bad at leaving comments on essays that were short. For the class there were three short ungraded essays, two short graded essays, and then three longer papers. She left basically no comments on the first two and only made comments on the longer papers (and even then, not a lot) so I never felt like I knew how to improve.
For grading, she strangely gave out number grades instead of letters and I never understood what the difference between a 89 and a 90 or a 93 and a 94 are to her when it comes to writing. It all just seemed very arbitrary, and she never explained it.
Overall, she was nice and I feel like the seminar would have felt a bit slow and a bit worthless regardless of who I had or when it was. The lectures itself (with Erik Gray) were the gem of the course.